|
|
| Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation (Photo credit: pixelhut) |
PART ONE:-
ABUSE OF POWER:
We are reminded first and foremost, that:
"Silence helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." [Elie Wiesel]
Hear this: Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation (SOSF) is turning into a silent and secret racist organisation. In order for this to stop, it must be exposed now.
It is currently being run by a man called Ed Tytherleigh, who we are told is Eton, educated, like our Prime Minister. That may be so, but he has also claimed to have been a member of our Armed Forces. This however, has been proved NOT to be so.
His staff such as Donna Gurney-Iginla, were sacked by Local Authority, so obtuse and incompetent they are. Arguably with leadership and staff such as these, it is up to us, the ordinary public, to protect the people under their unworthy care. Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation is not a business. Its very existence is two-fold. Firstly, it is a MILITARY 'Charity'. Secondly, it is a permanent convalescent home for sick former Military men and women.
Veterans. Our Heroes.
For Many years now, after forming during the
Great War, by Mr Oswald Stoll,
Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation (SOSF), was seen as a credible
charity organisation, providing homes for sick and needy former military personnel. Based at
Fulham Road, next to
Chelsea football ground, in West London, Rick Brunwin was its CEO for some 25 years, until he retired at the end of July, 2011.
Following Ricks departure, his successor Ed Tytherleigh took over as its new CEO. Paying no regard whatsoever to the late Sir Oswald Stoll, his estate, any living relatives, or even the sick veterans living there , Ed Tytherleigh immediately changed the name of Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation, to
'Stoll'. Droll, Stupid, or both? -- you might want to ask.
Arguable too, when he changed the name, Ed Tytherleigh immediately changed what this great charitable organisation once stood for -- sticking up for the rights and needs, of its Military Veterans; whether they be white or black. It would seem that with the departure of Rick Brunwin and the arrival of Ed Tytherleigh, things have changed from excellent to pathetic. And worsening, still. Daily.
Immediately after he arrived, Ed Tytherleigh wasted a small fortune of the foundation's money (charity money, some donated by you), changing the letterhead and logo of that formerly respected organisation. He spent another fortune overhauling SOSF's website, which is now peppered with lies in order to suit his purpose. Additionally, as if to stamp his authority on the place, he wasted an even larger amount of the charity's money, on among other things, a huge, brand new, white van. That van is a apparently a permanently stationary showpiece on the grounds of SOSF, with '
Stoll' emblazoned all over it.
Perhaps Ed Tytherleigh intends to change the name of this Veterans' Home, again. Next year it shall probably be called, the Ed Tytherleigh Foundation. Again wasting your donations emblazoning his name all over letter heads, logos, website, white vans and everything else in sight.
There is a history of Eton failures, as you know, who have found success on the backs of unfortunate and hard working victims, whose ideas/thunder they have stolen, because, as Etonians, they feel the world owes them Power -- above all else.
In his Christmas news letter to the Veterans last year, he alluded to being a Military man. Nothing can further be further from the truth. Still, it gives an indication of the person -- someone who has never been anything apart from a school tie, and now considers himself to be everything -- which he clearly can NEVER become.
In his assault on the Veterans' Home (his new project) he cut back on investments, such as newspapers. He no longer repairs computers in their computer room. He has disabled the Wi-Fi Broadband system so that veterans who cannot use the computer room are unable to get Internet access in their flats. Additionally, he got rid of the Asian computer tutor; and reneged on a promise to have the computer room open 24/7.
So, veterans who have freely served their country, must now queue up in their home, to use computers donated to them; since they cannot be accessed after 6 o'clock on an evening. During the day of course, these computers are used by Ed Tytherleigh's staff, while veterans hang around in vain, trying to get to use them.
He has allowed his staff to take over the place completely, kowtowing to their demands whilst totally neglecting the needs of the more vulnerable veterans. The ones who cannot stand up for their selves. It might astound you to learn how much these veterans enjoy reading, given the generic throwaway term 'thick squaddies'. A great part of their entertainment at SOSF is their library.
Since Tytherleigh's arrival, however, most of their library books have disappeared and are not being replaced.
Were the emphasis of thick squaddie shifted to 'stupid SOSF staff' that indeed would be
appropriate and permanent, until an immediate shape up or
ship out exercise is adhered to at SOSF.
Also, can you imagine that these Veteran's, once great athletes in their own rights, do not even have access to 'Sky Television', when staff has access to it? True, there is television in their computer room, but they cannot watch sky news or Sky sports on it. This is a pleasure available only to Ed Tytherleigh's staff in their office, we have been told.
Another bugbear by these veterans, is the fact that even where Housing Benefit is paid (grudgingly we may add) by the council, they still have to find money (perhaps by stealing, since they are unable to work) to pay 'Water Charges/Rates'. They are convinced that this money can be found by SOSF (but in any case, paid by the council [which has it's own spies working there, among them]) if SOSF employed less staff. They are convinced, also, that staff who should not be working here, do so on a "secret 'budy-budy' system"; since they are untrained, unintelligent, uncaring and produce nothing positive for these Veterans. In fact, their presence produce a complete negative effect, which disadvantage the Veterans in many ways; the main one being, that those idle people get paid for doing nothing.
That bugbear has apparently been brought to Ed Tytherleigh's attention. He totally disagrees with it's sentiment; and you shall see why, later.
Unlike Rick Brunwin who was nearly first in to work and last out on a daily basis, Ed Tytherleigh is conspicuous by his absence from SOSF. The man works from home and has even banned meetings, which the veterans usually had on a regular basis, when Rick Brunwin was in charge. "From these meetings, points raised above, would be aired and rectified, by Rick"; we are told.
So with the arrival of the permanent absentee, CEO, Ed Tytherleigh, it seems apposite to state that SOSF has become the opposite of what it stood for, when Rick Brunwin was in charge. Alike the black veteran who Tytherleigh has made an immediate victim of, SOSF itself, has been made a victim of change by him also: A changed name, a dark and desolate existence; and now a complete change from democracy to outright
'autocracy'.
Perhaps we are witnessing the rise and rise of Tytherleigh-the-terrible. From Eton.
Veteran's claim: 'The way they treat you, you would think that you were an intruder in their home, rather than the other way around. They want you to be grateful for having them, rather than their being grateful to work here. Let's face it, they have no qualifications and no commonsense. They were sacked by local authorities because they are useless. Were they to leave here nobody in their right mind would employ them. But instead of being grateful to the Veterans here for allowing them meals for their tables, they abuse their powers and us veterans into the bargain. Furthermore, they cannot empathise with us, because they have never served in the Armed Forces, as we have.
'Yet they still get paid more than qualified workers doing their jobs elsewhere. Fancy phoning your former colleagues at the Council, after the Council has sacked you, telling them you get paid more than them now, even though you still do not know as much as them, and certainly do less work than them. A powerful feeling you can be sure. The kind of 'power' which corrupts -- and is arguably being used now for that purpose, at SOSF.
' Another thing, when the computers are working, you try getting on one, when the
hoity-toity (staff) are on their many and varied extended lunch breaks. You'll find them sat at our computers. Yet naturally we cannot use the computers in their offices.
' And that cleaner of theirs -- it's as if he owns our computer room. He comes to work in the morning, does five minutes with his brush, then spends the rest of the day playing on our computers. No member of staff should ever be allowed into our computer room, except our tutor, when s/he is on duty. Come to think of it, they should not be allowed anywhere on our estate, except in the area where they are working. They have been given far too much freedom and power around here. Therein lies the problem.
'So much power indeed, that even nepotism has now crept in. That lazy cleaner has his wife working here as well. She is supposed to be a Carer. Comes in for an our or two on weekdays. Takes the same elderly woman shopping, everyday, and then goes home. For that she gets a full time wage. Can you believe it? No wonder staff treat us as if we don't exit. I am sure that in their heart of hearts they can't believe their luck -- you know, getting paid a fortune for doing nothing; or next to nothing, knowing that they could not even find work elsewhere.
'Oh, and apart from that smelly cleaner. They have cleaners who work inside the buildings as well. But inside, the buildings are very untidy. No body checks their work. So we have indoor cleaners outdoor cleaners, gardeners and a whole bunch of redundant workers and title for workers. Only they are not at home redundant. They get paid every single day; while the place is still filthy and whatever work those in the office are supposed to do, we don't know, because we see no benefits coming our way.
'To make matters worse, they close the office for about two hours every day. While some of them spend half of that time in the local pubs, the other half use our computers. They then swap over. So much money and manpower here and none of it is used for the better good of us veterans, by those worthless clowns, who are meant to be caring for us.
'Staff here need to be put back in line and be told that Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation belongs to us.
Veterans. "You work for us. If you are therefore not up to the mark or you step out of line, we get rid of you". Sadly, it is the other way around. Few of them (if any!) reach the level of competence expected of them, in working
FOR us VETERANS; yet they can virtually do whatever they like to us and no one bats an eye lid; as you can see by the way they are treating that black bloke.
'I know that bloke by the way. He is sound, man. Sound. Seems shy to, but very polite, man. Very polite, you don't want to believe a thing those people tell you. Keeps himself to himself. Don't blame him either. They are a right shower them staff.
'I mean where else could this happen? But more to the point -- how can this be allowed to happen to to us. Yes, those of us who would have given our lives for our country; only to be treated like fools and animals, by people clearly lower than animals; people who would never fight for this country as we have.
'My God, you hear about people being laid off work elsewhere due to the state of our economy, yet you have people here getting paid for doing absolutely nothing. They have no trade, no skills, no job description; yet they get paid week in week out.
They have been sacked by local councils for God sakes. I mean, seriously; who gets sacked from local authority?
'The money squandered on those workers who should not be working here -- or anyplace else, come to think of it, should be properly spent on us veterans. Only, even the guy in charge isn't intelligent enough to see it, or do it. A Private soldier with six months basic training under her or his belt could make a better fist of running this place than present incumbent.
'
After twenty five years of running SOSF, Rick Brunwin would have left a blueprint for the next twenty five years. Alas though, it would seem that within five months of his
noble and distinguished departure, Ed Tytherligh, had torn it up. Instead, he has certainly commence to submerge Sir Oswald
Stoll Foundation.
'Stoll'?
STOL, would have been more apt; for Tytherleigh. Indeed, since he has apparently never announced his arrival to these Veterans, and since he works from home, making it impossible for them to communicate, a
Short
Take
Off and
Landing by him, to any other place, would be welcomed by these vulnerable veterans.
PART TWO :-
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE & RACIAL DISCRIMINATION:
Recently a black veteran who is continually victimised and humiliated by staff at the foundation, complained about victimisation and discrimination from the medical centre, stationed inside Sir Oswald Stoll foundation.
Ed Tytherleigh did nothing, whatsoever. Instead, he claims that the Medical Centre at Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation has nothing to do with him.
You might want to wonder then, why he accepts any money paid to Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation by Dr Tim McNicholas from that practice, since it has nothing to do with him.
It will not surprise you, when you learn too, that at the same time the Medical Centre refused to treat the black veteran, and instead banned him from ever visiting it again, Ed Tytherleigh was evicting this same veteran from his flat, on the Foundation. Donna Gurney-Ingila the Housing Officer (failed Council worker) had already placed an Eviction Order at the local court, to force the black veteran out of his home, and away from the foundation. Wonder of wonders, apparently Ed Tytherleigh knew nothing about that, either, so could do nothing about it. Definitely nice work to have, when you clearly have to do nothing and know anything, or even have to turn up; even though you are in charge. Supposedly. There goes the 'Eton Boy' for you!
The veteran at the heart of this dreadful manoeuvre, did absolutely nothing to be banned from either the surgery in his home, or indeed his own flat (apart from being born black, of course), as you shall see later. Yet he is now bereft of medication and suffering, daily. Tim McNicholas the doctor at Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation refuses to treat him, yet recommends that he goes to a particular surgery, some two to three miles away, possibly part owned by him.
That centre is partnered by by Dr Jefferies, at 292 Munster Road, London SW6 6BQ (Phone Number 0207 385 1965).
Wouldn't you say it is rather strange that McNicholas refuses to treat the black veteran, yet nonetheless recommends to him a particular surgery? Are we looking at one of those recently discovered cases where doctors have struck patients off their books yet continue to claim money on their behalf? Would this be one of these scenarios where
both surgeries owned, or part-owned by one doctor, or his friend(s) would be claiming payment for the same patient, since the connection would not be made by the government? A situation where both doctors fill their boots from one vulnerable patient?
Ah, but we are only asking? Perhaps you may tell us!
According to veterans:
"That Doctor, ahh he's a piece a work man. This lady, Ana I think her name is, went to see him about her illness, after a few minutes he gets up, open the surgery door and tells her to 'get out' your time is up."
"That Medical Centre is closed on Thursday and all the weekend. They operate in our yard, but you try calling them to your flat if you have an emergency. No Chance. They don't do house calls. If you ask me we could do with a doctor who has bedside manners."
"Oh, he must take home at least three-hudred grand a year working part-time from this surgery alone. He has other partnership surgeries you know."
"Gawd those receptionists. Pheeeww. Don't know their names. They are very unpleasant, though. Not nice people at all ..."
"Ah can well see them doing it to that black guy, though. ... No, a don't know him personally. He's very quiet. Very easy-going. No, a think if they try to ban one of us, using trump up chargers they would have a riot on their hands ... Na, they wouldn't try it on with a white tenant. No way."
Naturally, the veteran rightly refuses to attend that surgery recommended by McNicholas -- or any other surgery. Indeed, why should he? Now, effectively we have a situation where McNicholas refuses to accept the right of this black man to belong at SOSF. So McNicholas freely walks his dog around the black man's home. He has parking privileges in this man's yard for all of his staff, personal friends and himself. Additionally, he is exploiting the many other advantages/benefits (including, and especially, the
commercial ones) of Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation being a
'Charity'. But,
maliciously and with
bias, he deprives the poor black veteran of these benefits, for whom SOSF intended -- and would be given, were his skin not different in colour to McNicholas'.
These Poignant questions must therefore be asked:
1) Does McNicholas realise that even though this man is black, that Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation is his home and not the other way around?
2) Is Ed Tytherleigh the CEO, actually so stupid, arrogant, inept, racist -- or ALL, to remind McNicholas of that simple, yet important fact?
3) Has it not occurred to either or both men, whose thoughts and judgements are so utterly impaired and clouded by
racism, that as they clearly have a problem with the colour of this veteran's skin, then it is they who
MUST leave this black man's
RIGHTFUL HOME?
4) Is it not now time for Sir Oswald Stoll to be run by former Military personnel, including doctors, nurses and other professionals who have served with the military?
For one thing, they shall be able to empathise with veterans of all colours and creeds, since they too
would have proudly served their Country, just as the veterans living there have; and unlike Tytherleigh and
McNicholas ever could.
For another, being intelligent, understanding, caring; with discipline and empathy, there would be none
of the current waste, pilfering (staff take items from the Foundation gifted to veterans and from senile
veteran' flats) incompetence and blatant racism currently allowed under this incompetent retard --
Ed Whatchamacallit ...
5) Why is there not an authority at SOSF (with Veterans' representatives) whereby Veteran's may complain about bullying, racial discrimination and the waste of their inheritance by arrogant, ungrateful and incompetent fools, such are presently running SOSF?
8) Why is there not a body at SOSF (with Veterans' representative) which monitors the work and behaviour of its staff?
9) How can SOSF, which is both a 'Charity' and a 'Care Home' for the military, be FULLY run by unqualified, uncaring, unsympathetic Civilians?
There are two reasons why SOSF is so poorly run and horribly led:
i) It is run and led by uncaring civilians.
ii) The Civilians who run SOSF see it as commercial Enterprise. A Cash cow. Their own personal Cashpoint. Indeed they are turning veterans against one another, whilst they are slowly building a more or less secret organisation, which if not stopped instantly, could soon become impenetrable from the outside -- even by government, MOD, or the military itself.
SOSF is pure and simple a consumer affair with 'Charity' status. It is NOT the commercial enterprise Ed Tytherleigh and Tim McNicholas are trying to make it into -- at any cost, including SLOWLY MURDERING A BLACK ARMY VETERAN, simply because his face does not fit their commercial plan.
Black our veteran may be, but in him, we have a man who has served his Queen and country for over ten years.
He rose to the rank of Sergeant in the British Army, undoubtedly the
greatest and toughest of Armies in all the world. Among
his many medals host of sporting trophies, commendations, accolades, is his
Northern Ireland Gallant Service Medal. On completing his Military
Service, his discharge certificate reads 'EXEMPLARY SERVICE'. That is
the highest of five category discharge certificates. You don't suppose
that in those days anyone saw his colour as a bar to his obvious winning qualities,brilliant leadership skills, and ability to achieve job satisfaction, do you?
This
is a man who has been responsible for Military personnel, money and
equipment. A man who paid his own University fees for studying Government and Politics; and has no regrets for having the government pay the fees his Law Diploma. He is proud to have worked and earned his achievements. By the same token, he has earned the right to live at Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation. He has earned the right to be treated with respect.
You cannot say however, that Tytherleigh, McNicholas and their kind, have the right to work at SOSF. If such men could not find time to serve their Queen and country (as this black man did) then they have no right working at SOSF. But to then be given the opportunity to, and then have the temerity to decide that because a man is BLACK (despite him doing more than they have for this country -- Us) he has no right being there, in UNACCEPTABLE. UNFORGIVABLE.
But all is not yet lost for our sick black veteran who is still being refused his medication and admission to his medical centre, by Tim McNicholas. And, and who is still being Evicted from his flat, by Ed Tytherleigh.
On Monday 19th March, the local court refused to evict the black
veteran from his flat.
Ed Tytherleigh wants you to believe that the Medical Centre in Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation has nothing to do with him. He wants you to believe also, that he knew nothing about his Housing Officer simultaneously evicting the black veteran, when the surgery were banning him. Indeed, he might even refuse to accept the fact that both his housing officer and the receptionist who kept stopping the black veteran from getting a doctor's appointment, are huge bosom buddies. They are regular lunchtime companions. The pavements on the Fulham road would have trembled under their excess weights and would swear to it; if street pavements could talk.
Ed Tytherligh can talk -- or one assumes, but he won't tell you the truth. However, just as certain as night follows day, these two racially motivated incidents are by design. They were cruelly planned and executed in the corridors of Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation. They are inextricably linked; and they are sanctioned by him.
As you can see, McNicholas decides to send the black veteran to their surgery miles away. Tytherleigh was then to put on his caring act and inform the court (another hearing is on 2nd July, at 2pm, at West London County Court, Talgarth Road, Hammersmith) that he could guarantee this black veteran, cheaper accommodation, out in the sticks, where Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation has access to other properties.
Indeed, the penultimate black veteran sent to Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation to live, was soon shipped off to properties outside of Fulham/Central London, under those arrangements.
In partnership with the local authority, Hammersmith and Fulham and a Housing body called West Way, veterans at SOSF can volunteer to live outside of Central London with their help. Only, the veterans must volunteer to move -- not be volunteered to, by Tytherleigh,
et al. It was Tytherleigh's plan that on being faced with the prospect of getting thrown out onto the streets, else live out in the sticks, the black veteran's choice would be a no-brainer. The sticks, of course. Only,Tytherleigh clearly did not count on the fact that we would unearth these truths.
PART THREE:-
TRUMPED-UP CHARGES:
HOUSING EVICTION
Ironically, Hammersmith and Fulham council is actually a member of this scheme with SOSF, West Way and others, where SOSF staff can move out of Central London to live.
An coincidence, perhaps?
The black veteran's Housing Benefit was suddenly stopped by this council, between them and among others, SOSF present Housing Officer, Donna Gurney-Iginla. No reason was given to the veteran then. And none is given now, either.
Donna Gurney-Iginla nonetheless continues to humiliate him and threaten him with eviction. Perhaps she wants him to lose his temper and strike out, giving her legitimate reason to kick him out. (After all, isn't that the way black men behave?) Because, clearly the veteran cannot pay money towards his rent which he does not have.
This is a woman who has lied consistently about the Veteran's circumstances in order to get him thrown out. Indeed, she refuses to answer letters written to her by the veteran, since in so doing, would confirm that she has been lying about the case, all along. This is a woman who had SOSF's barrister lied to the court about the amount of rent he is charged by SOSF, so as to hide the fact that said veteran is actually charged more rent than others.
This is a woman who when the Veterans' Aid paid moneys to his rent to avoid him being evicted, lied in papers she drafted for the court, claiming that the money came from elsewhere. Indeed, it may surprise you that this lying, deceitful woman is still employed by SOSF. Do be, the reason for this is because Ed Tytherleigh clearly approves of what she is doing. After all, she is working for McNicholas' and his joint cause -- keep SOSF and its surrounds, WHITE.
And whilst this woman happily blocks our veteran's Housing Benefit, she gladly rakes in her tons of Child Benefits for her many children, as well as any other benefits she may be entitled to; (As do her friends in the Medical Centre at SOSF, should it apply to them). In the meantime she (and they) turn up at SOSF and pretend to do honest work. You will have to agree I am sure, that what goes on at this 'Charity', SOSF, is not at all charitable.
Lest we forget, this is a man who has selflessly served Queen and country. Now, having his Housing Benefits stopped by others who thinks that he is of the wrong colour to live in the Veterans Rest, set aside for him -- not to mention that they are working in the man's home. And, not to mention too, a people who cannot even hold down a council job. Somewhat surreal, wouldn't you say?
That indeed (his non payment of rent, which he has absolutely no control over) is the catalyst used by Tytherleigh to precipitate the black veteran's eviction.
BAN FROM MEDICAL CENTRE AT SOSF:
Just in case you hadn't guessed, the catalyst precipitating our black veteran's ban from the surgery was
'rudeness'. That tried and tested rule which always win racial discrimination cases for whites over black, since ALL black men are by nature rude.
So, 'JUST SAY THE BLACK MAN IS RUDE. THE COURT WILL ALWAYS BELIEVE YOU BECAUSE IT BEING ALL WHITE, ANYWAY WILL CERTAINLY CONSIDER A BLACK MAN RUDE; IN HAVING THE TEMERITY TO STAND UP TO A WHITE PERSON AND TELL THEM THAT WHAT THEY ARE DOING IS WRONG. ie, to sack, suspend, ban the black man/victim -- since GOD made him black.
OF COURSE, WERE THE VICTIM ON THE OTHER HAND, WHITE, HE WOULD MERELY HAVE BEEN, BEING
'assertive'. Asserting his God given rights, no less.
A BLACK MAN THOUGH, WOULD IN ALL CASES be
'rude' (because surely God does not give such a person rights; nor intellect, to reason.) Luckily that sort of thinking is a thing of the past. And, long may it stay so. Our Courts and Tribunals are beginning to see through the Tessa Newby's of this world.
The Black Veteran having tried for two months to obtain an appointment with a doctor, was repeatedly refused one. When his medication completely ran out, the veteran returned to the surgery, explained his predicament, and asked to see a doctor and obtain his medication, yet again. This is even though the Centre has 'Emergency' cover, for such instances. On being sent away yet again, the veteran asserted his Human Rights and refused to leave the surgery until he saw a doctor and his prescription filled.
The head receptionist at the surgery, Tessa Newby, humiliated our veteran in front of a packed surgery. She threatened him with calling the police, laughed about his name, patronised him and refused him seeing a doctor, among other things. Clearly it is her who was rude and must certainly be the shallowest, most devious, and least professional medical receptionist in all London.
As we have said 'Rudeness' is a tried and tested winning formula for a charge against black men, from the likes of Tessa Newby (whilst they claim to have black families and friends themselves, so can in no way be racist [All the tricks in the book. Our Courts/Tribunals however are now wise to them.]). Who knows, she has probably gotten away using this same lie, in the past, to hide her obvious racism.
Only, this time their own surgery cameras will certainly be her downfall, because they will certainly show no evidence of rudeness on the part of our veteran who rightly stood up for his Human Rights to be medically treated --
and in his own home too. Only to be deprived by this arrogant racist woman, Tessa Newby -- a working guest, in the veteran's home, of all places; lest we forget.
It seems rather strange, too, that the veteran in his tenth year at SOSF would suddenly be rude to Tessa Newby, when in all manner of atrocities done to him at SOSF, he has behaved with stoic dignity. His car tyres have been slashed, his car been smashed, his flat has been entered into by staff (even broken in to by them); his allotment has been sabotaged, a BNP former soldier and his mates conspired to have him banned from a local pub, so as not to have 'to be in the same place as HIM' ("our easy-going, gentle-giant" black veteran [as described by others]) . All throughout, our black veteran has remained resolute and importantly, NOT HAVING TO BE 'RUDE'; even though all the acts mentioned (and others which have not bee) were carried out repeatedly against him. That is to say, each act was repeated time and time again.
It is clear therefore that Tessa Newby is lying (as the surgery cameras will show) and she is intentionally stereotyping this black man, believing that everyone would believe her, since 'surely, ALL black men are rude.' Rude no doubt for having the temerity of breathing the same air as Tessa Newby and her kind.
A wrong
, disrespectful and racist attitude, Tessa Newby. More to the point, IT IS YOU, TESSA NEWBY, WHO IS RUDE --- AND INDEED A LIAR, ALSO!
Ed Tytherleigh, Tim McNicholas, Tessa Newby, Donna Gurney-Iginla and the rest of those responsible for effectively still slowly torturing and murdering this poor, sick, elderly Veteran, because he is BLACK, must not be allowed to get away with it, because:
"Where laws end, tyranny begins." [William Pitt]
PART FOUR:-
BLACK VETERAN'S SPRING
Clearly this unlawful and unjustified behaviour of Ed Tytherleigh
and Tim McNicholas can NEVER be tolerated, in 21st Century, London.
For one thing, our sick veterans, white and black have the right to be treated with with respect. And, for another, these two unsavoury individuals must make you think twice, the next time you are tempted to make a donation to
ANY military charity again.
Indeed the Royal British Legion, SSAFA and other such genuine and caring Military charity organisations can only suffer as a result of any association with Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation from now on. Because, surely the next time you are tempted to volunteer for these organisations or send them a donation, you are going to think twice about the racist, unlawful and unacceptable treatment meted out on this poor veteran, by Tim McNicholas, Ed Tytherleigh and their staff
at Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation, merely because he is black.
The Arab Spring of last year, proved there is power in each of us individuals to help cull our world of evil dictators, as well as these racist staff at SOSF. First things first, however, that poor sick black hero deserves his medication. Immediately. Also, his mind must be put at ease,that he is safe from eviction. No man should be put through this unwarranted treatment merely because of his colour -- especially in a place built for him/Veterans.
Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation is not a place for Racism, Victimisation, Bullying and such other vile atrocities to be taking place. To protest against this and as to how poorly Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation is governed and
led:
Ed Tytherleigh: 020 7385 2110; CEO Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation, evicting the black veteran from his home.
Dr Tim McNicholas: 020 7385 6001; refusing to give the black veteran his medication, banning him from the surgery at Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation; and ordering him to attend a partnership surgery miles away.
Dr Jeffreyes : 020 7385 1965; for wanting to accept a black patient recommended by Tim McNicholas, although Tim McNicholas does not want the patient in the surgery (he thinks he owns) which is based in the Veterans' Home at Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation.
- COMPLAIN TO YOUR MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT.
- COMPLAIN TO NICK HARVEY ARMED FORCES MINISTER.
- COMPLAIN TO THE ROYAL BRITISH LEGION.
- COMPLAIN TO SSAFA.
- COMPLAIN TO THE VA.
- COMPLAIN TO YOUR LOCAL NEWSPAPER.
- COMPLAIN TO THE GUARDIAN.
- COMPLAIN TO THE EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION.
************** ***************** ****************** ****************
UNTIL SIR OSWALD STOLL FOUNDATION REMOVE THESE UNWORTHY STAFF FROM THE SICK VETERAN'S HOME, RATHER THAN THE OTHER WAY AROUND:-
- STOP MAKING DONATIONS TO SIR OSWALD STOLL FOUNDATION.
- STOP BUYING BURGERS AND ALL OTHER FOODS FROM SIR OSWALD STOLL FOUNDATION'S SOUP KITCHEN, ON MATCH DAYS AT CHELSEA FOOT BALL GROUND.
- START DEMONSTRATING AGAINST SIR OSWALD STOLL FOUNDATION, FOR CONDONING THE RACIAL DISCRIMINATION AND VICTIMISING OF AN INNOCENT, SICK, BLACK, VETERAN; BY ITS OWN CEO AND THE MEDICAL STAFF WHO EARN THEIR LIVING, WORKING FROM THE GROUNDS OF SIR OSWALD STOLL FOUNDATION (THE VETERAN'S HOME).
Remember, this particular case may be about a black Army veteran being cruelly and needlessly abused. However, it concerns people of all colour and creed, in care homes, everywhere; as well as Charity Organisations. There are good carers as well as these foul ones at Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation. Furthermore there are good Civilian Charities, as well as Military Charities, such as The Royal British Legion (RBL) as opposed to this appalling one, that is Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation. Only by exposing Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation as dangerous charity and its staff as worthless and inhumane carers -- can we shine a light on good carers and great Military Charities such as the RBL, SSAFA, VA, etc. PLEASE DO NOT STAY SILENT AND LET OUR BLACK VETERAN DIE -- OR IF HE DOES, DON'T LET IT BE IN VAIN!
"Silence helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." [Elie Wiesel]
PART FIVE:-
A PROPER MILITARY CHARITY: "Veterans' Aid"
FINALLY:The black veteran who presently has no access to medication, and still fears he may lose his home "because of that racist lot at Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation", wishes to thank Wing Commander, Dr Hugh Milroy, PhD, OBE , the CEO of Veterans Aid, Buckingham Place Road, Victoria, London, for: Feeding him, Clothing him, paying household bills, as well as offering Mental Health support, "while Donna Gurney-Iginla, a failed Council Worker, now working at SOSF refuses to sort my Housing and other benefits out with the Local Council. This is after she colluded with the Council to have them stopped in the first place, so that she could kick me out of here as I am not white enough for SOSF". This thanks he wishes to pass on, also, to ALL of the Wing Commander's staff, who are, he says: "actually real caring human beings; unlike that selfish, useless, money-grabbing, untrained, unprofessional lot, at Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation".
He begs, if you can afford it, That you please make a donation to them (VA), since had it not been for the VA, "I would not be here now speaking to you. I'd be long gone. Dead. And believe me, as small a body that they are ... [I bet you never heard of them]"
'No, can't say I have of them.'
"You see? Small as they are, the Veterans' Aid has helped thousands like me, who SOSF and others have wilfully let down over the years. Because their hearts (SOSF) are not in it. They are only in it for the money. Money they put into their own pockets; while they abuse the Veterans placed into their care."
PLEASE MAKE A DONATION (EVEN A TINY ONE) TO THE 'VETERANS AID' TODAY,
TO THANK THEM, FOR
HELPING BRITISH MILITARY VETERANS,
REGARDLESS
OF COLOUR. HERE, TODAY, PLEASE!:
http://www.veterans-aid.net/donations.html
******************************************************
"Bombs and bullets do not discriminate between black and white soldiers. Therefore, you should never discriminate between black and white survivors of war. You must never discriminate between black and white human beings. Period!" [Out-Racism]
http://out-racism.blogspot.com
outracism@gmail.com
